Banks – Australia 2025

LIB 2.6%

Incumbent MP
David Coleman, since 2013.

Geography
Southern Sydney. Banks covers large parts of the St George area and neighbouring suburbs. It includes a majority of the Georges River council area and south-western parts of the Canterbury-Bankstown council area. Key suburbs include East Hills, Panania, Padstow, Picnic Point, Revesby, Mortdale, Peakhurst, Penshurst, Blakehurst, Carss Park, Kyle Bay and Oatley.

Redistribution
Banks expanded north, taking in Milperra from Blaxland and parts of Punchbowl and Roselands from Watson. Banks also took in Blakehurst, Carss Park and Kyle Bay from Cook and lost Allawah and Carlton to Barton. These changes cut the Liberal margin from 3.2% to 2.6%.

History
Banks was created for the 1949 election, and was held by Labor continuously until 2013.

The seat was first won in 1949 by Labor candidate Dominic Costa. Costa held the seat for twenty years, always as a member of the opposition, retiring in 1969.

Vince Martin was elected in 1969, and held the seat until he was defeated for preselection in 1980 by John Mountford. Mountford held the seat until his retirement in 1990.

In 1990, Banks was won by Labor candidate Daryl Melham. Melham held the seat for over two decades, serving in the Opposition shadow ministry from 1996 to 1998 and again from 2001 to 2004. Successive swings against the ALP wore his margin down to 1.06% in 2004, although a favourable redistribution before the 2007 election, combined with a swing of almost 8%, made the seat much safer.

Daryl Melham narrowly held on in 2010 despite a 9% swing, and in 2013 he lost to Liberal candidate David Coleman with a further 3.3% swing. Coleman has been re-elected three times.

Candidates

Assessment
Banks is a marginal seat, but has trended towards the Liberal Party over the last two decades. The seat was Labor-held throughout the entire Howard government, and generally voted to the left of New South Wales until 2013. At the 2019 and 2022, the Liberal two-party-preferred vote was substantially higher in Banks than across the state. A strong Labor result could see this seat flipping, but otherwise it will likely stay with the Liberals.

2022 result

Candidate Party Votes % Swing Redist
David Coleman Liberal 41,622 45.2 -5.7 44.6
Zhi Soon Labor 32,459 35.3 -1.1 35.8
Natalie Hanna Greens 8,063 8.8 +2.9 8.6
Marika Momircevski United Australia 5,048 5.5 +3.3 5.6
Malcolm Heffernan One Nation 2,628 2.9 +2.9 3.3
Elouise Ivy Cocker Liberal Democrats 1,264 1.4 +1.4 1.2
Steve Khouw Independent 961 1.0 +1.0 0.9
Informal 6,550 6.6 -0.6

2022 two-party-preferred result

Candidate Party Votes % Swing Redist
David Coleman Liberal 48,969 53.2 -3.1 52.6
Zhi Soon Labor 43,076 46.8 +3.1 47.4

Booth breakdown

Polling places in Banks have been divided into three parts: central, east and west. The west covers the former Bankstown council area, while the other two cover the Georges River council area and the small part of the former Canterbury council area.

The Liberal Party won a majority of the two-party-preferred vote in all three areas, ranging from 50.6% in the centre to 55.4% in the east.

Voter group GRN prim LIB 2PP Total votes % of votes
Central 8.6 50.6 20,491 20.7
West 8.2 54.7 19,588 19.8
East 9.4 55.4 15,942 16.1
Pre-poll 7.7 51.6 27,171 27.4
Other votes 9.9 51.7 15,898 16.0

Election results in Banks at the 2022 federal election
Toggle between two-party-preferred votes and primary votes for the Liberal Party, Labor and the Greens.

Become a Patron!

70 COMMENTS

  1. Libs will gain the seats I stated in WA. And in Nat and in tas. The libs will never gain a seat in act unless under extreme circumstances. QLD is a bit hard to read. But atm status quo. And as both Sturt and booth y could flip. There gains are gonna mainly come in vic and nsw anyway.

  2. Noticed that movement too Mick. I think it’s a tough ask for Labor to win here given the changing demographics, but the X-factor could be general global and economic uncertainty driving voters to the safety/stability of the incumbent government.

  3. Margin 2.6% from my knowledge living a little past the other side of Canterbury Rd
    This area between Canterbury Rd and King Georges Rd can generate a stronger alp vote.
    Coleman overall is seen as better than the liberal party…. which makes it harder to win.
    Maybe just maybe Dutton has poisoned the well just enough?????

  4. Interesting, I think that’s a sign of the shift to Labor in the polls and theoretically slender margin rather than anything particularly local.

    Zhi Soon would be a fantastic MP and has deep roots in the area having grown up there (which can’t be said for Coleman).

  5. The Labor Party did quite well in overlaying state seats in 2023, but those results aren’t as relevant anymore. Albo never campaigned in this seat in 2022 because he got COVID however he’s hasn’t gone to Banks yet again – which may be a sign that Labor isn’t hedging its bets in Banks. I think realistically this seat could only come into play if Labor continues to rise in Opinion polls.

  6. Labor didn’t announce Zhi Soon until February I believe. It’s a bit late but yes, you’re all right in that the polling/odds started improving for Labor recently.

    This is the only HoR contest with a Democrats candidate (if I’m not mistaken).

  7. i agree Banks is a bit of a strech if there was a by-election during the Honeymoon period i think Labor would have won it like they did in Aston. The waterfront areas are now strong Liberal suburbs but the more inland suburbs are still winnable for Labor. If interest rates started falling say before Xmas and there was a better economy then Banks, Bonner would be target seats.

  8. This is the sort of seat which could come into play if the Labor national 2PP vote gets up into the 53-54 range, which looks a lot more possible now than it did a few weeks ago.

  9. Bludgertrack has it as 51.9 (exactly the same as its national 2PP), which would be a 0.5 swing to Labor from 2022. I can’t see any reason to expect a Banks swing to differ much from the state average.

  10. The state 2PP is going to be different thanks to OPV. Taking the primary votes and calculating preference flows based on those primaries probably gets Labor an extra percent or two.

  11. Comparing state versus federal figures
    Oatley snd East Hills make up.a lot of this seat. Oakley down the wire libs just retained by the libs. ALP won East Hills is marginal by a couple of percent. This seat would be alp held on those figures

  12. Yes i meant the state component of the Federal polls. I still expect there to be an Anti-Labor swing in mortgage belt areas like Werriwa, Hume and parts of Paterson so that means there will be a bigger than a 0.5% swing to Labor in many seats and potentially Banks. Banks is not mortgage belt and more white collar and diverse so not reallt where Dutton plays the best

  13. Nimalan, would that make Banks the southern Sydney equivalent of Bennelong district? I know both are considered Liberal leaning swing seats, consisting of established and fairly affluent suburbs.

    I am not sure if Banks has the same concentration of ethnic minority voters (those of Asian background) when compared to Bennelong.

  14. @ Yon An
    I think there are some comparisons to Bennelong but some differences as well. Both have large East Asian communities although Bennelong and Reid have Korean in addition to the Chinese community while Banks is only Chinese. Banks also has a large Greek community especially closer to the Waterfront while Bennelong does not really have Greeks but as an Armenian community as well. Bennelong has some Muslims on the poorer northern Fringe which is a spillover of Watson/Blaxland which is not there in Bennelong. Banks is less affluent than Bennelong as it still has poorer areas inland such as Riverwood while Bennelong is mostly middle class and now has Elite areas like Hunters Hill. While i would not describe any part of Banks as Elite but areas like Kyle Bay, Oatley, Lugarno are Upper Middle Class.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here